Search for:
Examples (hovertap for more info):
term
, -term
, /r/subreddit
, -/r/subreddit
, site:example.com
, -site:example.com
, score:3
, before:2015-03-15
, after:2015-03-15
Sort by:
newest
oldest
top
You can be cool, but you can never be SGM Jamey Caldwell cool. 0
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 23:28:51
Gentlemen, my proposal for dealing with the Chinese spy balloon 58
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 23:13:35
I'm not even sure on what flair or specific title to put on this, tbh.. 36
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 23:02:04
Can’t wait for all the crappy “little dark age” edits on tik tok. 2
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 22:52:22
Putin and Kim Jong-un Lookalikes help Zelensky lookalike flee Ukraine 1
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 22:26:17
I feel so threatened! In the sky outside work this morning. 51
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 22:13:25
Non-Credible idea for new cope cage based on Stalinium 42
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-03, 22:00:42
Query breakdown by source domain
Top organizations this week
Top people this week
Top locations this week
API examples
Posts:
Comments:
For more information, see the API Reference page.
curl "https://socialgrep.com/api/v1/search/posts?query=%2Fr%2Fnoncredibledefense" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY"
Comments:
curl "https://socialgrep.com/api/v1/search/comments?query=%2Fr%2Fnoncredibledefense" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY"
For more information, see the API Reference page.
Query breakdown by source domain
Top organizations this week
Top people this week
Top locations this week
API examples
Posts:
Comments:
For more information, see the API Reference page.
curl "https://socialgrep.com/api/v1/search/posts?query=%2Fr%2Fnoncredibledefense" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY"
Comments:
curl "https://socialgrep.com/api/v1/search/comments?query=%2Fr%2Fnoncredibledefense" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_KEY"
For more information, see the API Reference page.
/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:21:41 , 1 score , -0.59 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:20:30 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:16:30 , 1 score , -0.54 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:54 , 1 score , -0.78 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:53 , 1 score , -0.05 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:44 , 1 score , +0.51 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:26 , 1 score , +0.66 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:18 , 1 score , -0.69 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:14 , 1 score , -0.20 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:15:11 , 1 score , +0.01 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:14:33 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:58 , 1 score , +0.40 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:52 , 1 score , +0.56 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:44 , 1 score , +0.93 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:43 , 1 score , +0.48 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:24 , 1 score , +0.77 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:13:08 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:12:45 , 1 score , +0.62 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:11:46 , 1 score , +0.36 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:11:27 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:11:07 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:11:05 , 1 score
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:10:35 , 1 score , -0.10 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:10:30 , 1 score , -0.00 sentiment rating
Permalink/r/noncredibledefense, 2023-02-04, 08:10:23 , 1 score , -0.13 sentiment rating
Permalink